NAVIGATION MAIN MENU

COMPENDIUM LIBRARY/TWITTER MONITOR
VIDEO GALLERY
Economic News
Newsbrief Archives
Democrat Leadership Twitter and Realtime Feeds
Cabinet twitter and realtime feeds
North America weblog
International weblog
Democrats twitter directory
Latest Government Jobs and Public Tenders
Jobs Matrix
Global Travel Information
Pop Entertainment Forum
Start Portal


Please make a donation to support upkeep of the daily news journal, back archives, twitter feeds and the compendium library.










2004 Stolen Election Update - the Ohio Recount Prosecutions«

Daily newsbrief journal for January 2007, also see http://www.usdemocrats.com/brief for a global 100-page perpetual brief and follow twitter @usdemocrats


2004 Stolen Election Update - the Ohio Recount Prosecutions«

Postby admin » Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:01 am

2004 Stolen Election Update - the Ohio Recount Prosecutions« Thread Started on Jan 22, 2007, 9:17am » --------------------------------------------------------------------------------2004 Stolen Election Update - the Ohio Recount ProsecutionsSubmitted by CactusPat on January 22, 2007 - 3:11amread at source> http://www.democrats.com/2004-Ohio-Reco ... secutionsA most thorough review of the fraudulent 2004 Ohio recount... Do new Ohio recount prosecutions indicate unraveling of 2004 election theft cover-up? by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman January 19, 2007Three criminal prosecutions in Ohio's biggest county have opened with strong indications that the cover-up of the theft of the 2004 presidential election is starting to unravel. Prosecutors say these cases involve "rigging" the recount in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), where tens of thousands of votes were shifted from John Kerry to George W. Bush, or else never counted. Meanwhile, corroborating evidence continues to surface throughout Ohio illuminating the GOP's theft of the presidency. According to the AP, County Prosecutor Kevin Baxter opened the Cuyahoga trial by charging that "the evidence will show that this recount was rigged, maybe not for political reasons, but rigged nonetheless."...(more) Baxter said the three election workers "did this so they could spend a day rather than weeks or months" on the recount.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 82092
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:00 am

Return to January 2007

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron