NAVIGATION MAIN MENU

COMPENDIUM LIBRARY/TWITTER MONITOR
VIDEO GALLERY
Economic News
Newsbrief Archives
Democrat Leadership Twitter and Realtime Feeds
Cabinet twitter and realtime feeds
North America weblog
International weblog
Democrats twitter directory
Latest Government Jobs and Public Tenders
Jobs Matrix
Global Travel Information
Pop Entertainment Forum
Start Portal


Please make a donation to support upkeep of the daily news journal, back archives, twitter feeds and the compendium library.










NRC COMPLETES REVIEW OF FIRE PROTECTION EXEMPTION REQUESTS A

Daily newsbrief journal for January 2012, also see http://www.usdemocrats.com/brief for a global 100-page perpetual brief and follow twitter @usdemocrats


NRC COMPLETES REVIEW OF FIRE PROTECTION EXEMPTION REQUESTS A

Postby admin » Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:44 pm

NRC COMPLETES REVIEW OF FIRE PROTECTION EXEMPTION REQUESTS AT INDIAN POINT; REQUESTS INFORMATION FROM ENTERGYThe Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has denied the majority of requests forexemptions from fire protection requirements at Indian Point Units 2 and 3. The two units, operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, are located in Buchanan, N.Y.Based on the information received in a March 6, 2009, exemption request from Entergy, the NRC staff has decided that most of the requests to substitute operator manual actions(OMAs) for fire protection features do not meet NRC’s criteria. For Indian Point Unit 2, theNRC is denying the use of OMAs for 24 of the 30 fire zones for which OMAs were requested. At Unit 3, the agency is rejecting the use of OMAs for 18 of the 20 fire zones requested. The company has implemented compensatory measures in these fire zones. They will remain in effect until the company completes its corrective actions.“After considering the compensatory measures, the NRC does not have an immediate safety concern,” Michele G. Evans, Director of Operating Reactor Licensing in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation said. “Although the two units have some deficiencies in theirdefense-in-depth, they have extensive fire protection programs, including an on-site fire brigade trained to respond to and extinguish fires. In addition, each unit has established fire watches to monitor areas containing the deficiencies.”During inspections conducted at all plants beginning in 2000, NRC inspectors found thatsome licensees were inappropriately relying on operator actions to meet NRC fire protectionrequirements, which are designed to maintain at least one set of equipment that can achieve safe shutdown free of fire damage. Certain NRC regulations do not specifically allow operatormanual actions in order to meet the requirements, although the NRC staff can approve such actions as part of an alternative compliance strategy through an exemption request. In June 2006, the NRC provided the industry with guidance on what is required by NRC fire protection regulations. And, in June 2007, the agency told reactor operators that the NRC would not take an enforcement action against a plant that was out of compliance due to the use of operator actionsif the plant completed corrective actions by March 6, 2009. Specifically, Entergy’s exemption request relied on post-fire operator manual actions to compensate for possible fire-induced failures of electrical circuits in lieu of the circuit protectionNRC NEWSU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOffice of Public Affairs, Region I475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.govBlog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.govNo. I-12-003Contact: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330Neil Sheehan (610) 337-5331February 1, 2012Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
requirements in NRC regulations. Methods such as fire detection, fire suppression, fire barriersand physical separation are used to meet the regulatory requirements, but operator manualactions can be approved by NRC as an acceptable means of meeting the rule. The NRC has been conducting an extensive review of Entergy’s requests, including three rounds of requests foradditional information to supplement the original Entergy submittal. The NRC also issued a letter to Entergy requesting its plans and schedules to achievecompliance with the fire protection rules. The NRC will complete inspections and inform thecompany of enforcement decisions regarding this matter at a later date. Entergy has 30 days to respond to the NRC’s request for information. #
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 82082
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:00 am

Return to January 2012

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron