NAVIGATION MAIN MENU

COMPENDIUM LIBRARY/TWITTER MONITOR
VIDEO GALLERY
Economic News
Newsbrief Archives
Democrat Leadership Twitter and Realtime Feeds
Cabinet twitter and realtime feeds
North America weblog
International weblog
Democrats twitter directory
Latest Government Jobs and Public Tenders
Jobs Matrix
Global Travel Information
Pop Entertainment Forum
Start Portal


Please make a donation to support upkeep of the daily news journal, back archives, twitter feeds and the compendium library.










NRC CLARIFIES EARTHQUAKE MEASUREMENTS AND DESIGN CRITERIAThi

Daily newsbrief journal for August 2011, also see http://www.usdemocrats.com/brief for a global 100-page perpetual brief and follow twitter @usdemocrats


NRC CLARIFIES EARTHQUAKE MEASUREMENTS AND DESIGN CRITERIAThi

Postby admin » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:00 am

NRC CLARIFIES EARTHQUAKE MEASUREMENTS AND DESIGN CRITERIA
This year has seen a dramatic increase in a question people regularly ask the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: “What magnitude earthquakes are U.S. nuclear power plants designed to withstand?” The answer, however, does not include a specific “magnitude.”The NRC requires U.S. reactors to withstand a predicted level of ground motion, oracceleration, specific to a given site. Ground acceleration is measured in relation to “g,” the acceleration caused by Earth’s gravity.An earthquake’s magnitude, often described on the Richter scale, is an expression of how much energy the quake released. It’s not possible to transform a given magnitude alone to ground acceleration at a site. Several important factors affect the relationship between anearthquake’s magnitude and associated ground acceleration, including the distance from the earthquake, the depth of the quake and the site’s local geology (i.e., hard rock or soil). A smallearthquake close to a site could therefore generate the same peak ground acceleration as a largeearthquake farther away.The NRC’s requirements call for a nuclear power plant’s design to account for groundacceleration that is appropriate for its location, given the possible earthquake sources that mayaffect the site and the makeup of nearby faults, etc. Existing U.S. plants were designed on a“deterministic” or “scenario earthquake” basis. In other words, examination of an area’s seismological history provides an understanding of the largest earthquake and associated groundacceleration expected at a plant site.Later this year, the agency expects to provide existing plants a seismic analysis tool based on work related to applications for new plants, along with the latest information on earthquakesources, so that the plants can perform an updated review. Applications for new nuclear power plants have taken a “probabilistic” approach to determining seismic hazards, looking at a widerange of possible quakes from sources that could affect a given site. The NRC has spent several years examining how these newer techniques can be used to re-evaluate existing nuclear power plant sites. UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 82092
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:00 am

Return to August 2011

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron